The legal duty of a psychiatrist or psychotherapist to warn an identifiable victim of a patient’s serious threat of harm has been well recognized in U.S. jurisprudence and clinical practice since the Tarasoff decision of the Supreme Court of California. It helps to discipline the all stakeholders and direct them in the right direction. I believe laws and regulations can guide as per specific situation, whereas ethics consider every aspect of life. The duty to warn arises when a patient has communicated an explicit threat of imminent serious physical harm or death to a clearly identified or identifiable victim or victims, and the patient has the apparent intent and ability to carry out such a threat. Both the client and counselor needs to be aware of his or her bounds in order to have effective results and a peaceful society.